“Rohit Sharma is a more dangerous batter than this star player”: Praveen Kumar

In the world of cricket, discussions about the most dangerous and effective batters often bring passionate debates and varied opinions. Recently, former Indian cricketer Praveen Kumar added fuel to this ongoing debate by comparing two of India’s modern-day batting legends, Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma. His insights not only provide a glimpse into the players’ skills but also shed light on the nuances that differentiate great batters in cricket.

Virat Kohli, acclaimed as one of his generation’s finest, has amassed over 24,000 runs in 522 matches across all formats, embodying consistency, aggression, and class. His ability to steer the team through challenging conditions and crucial matches has cemented his place as a cornerstone of Indian batting. However, according to Praveen Kumar, there’s a different flavor of danger that Rohit Sharma brings to the crease.

Praveen Kumar, who shared the dressing room with both stalwarts and faced them on the nets, offers a unique perspective from his bowling encounters. He acknowledges Kohli’s prowess but suggests that Rohit Sharma carries a certain edge. “Rohit plays late. I have bowled to Virat Kohli, and it was easier to dismiss him or catch him out, especially during the earlier times. Now, it’s challenging with both, but Rohit, with his sublime timing and extra second to play his shots, comes off as more menacing,” Kumar explained in his interaction with Shubhankar Mishra.

“Rohit Sharma is a more dangerous batter than this star player”: Praveen Kumar

The comparison doesn’t undermine Kohli’s achievements but highlights the different threats they pose to bowlers. While Kohli is a master of chases and building innings, Rohit’s ability to decimate attacks on his day, especially in the shorter formats with his elegant stroke play, offers a different dimension of danger.

The discourse also touched on another contemporary issue concerning Hardik Pandya and his participation in the Ranji Trophy. Kumar expressed disappointment over Pandya’s absence from red-ball cricket, advocating for accountability and equal standards for all players. He suggested that if Hardik intends to focus solely on white-ball cricket, it should be officially stated, emphasizing the importance of clarity and commitment to every format.

Praveen’s comments underscore the diverse fabric of Indian cricket, where each player, with their unique flair and approach, contributes to the team’s success. As debates like these continue, they reflect the passion and scrutiny that Indian cricket, its players, and performances command, highlighting the ever-evolving narrative of this beloved sport.